Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Reports and reaction from the 2012-2013 season as Walsall finished 9th in League 1
Forum rules
no avoiding the language filter, no text speak, no breaking the rules
no avoiding the language filter, no text speak, no breaking the rules
-
WarsawPact - UTS Legend
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:43 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Sadly it looks like my suggestion that we should all wear goggles and snorkles in memory of Gay Meadow, hasn't taken off.
Would have looked really good on TV, too...
Would have looked really good on TV, too...
-
PINNACLE - UTS Legend
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: the pinnacle
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
WarsawPact wrote:Sadly it looks like my suggestion that we should all wear goggles and snorkles in memory of Gay Meadow, hasn't taken off.
Would have looked really good on TV, too...
Thats just silly :wink:
-
Exile - Jobsworth
- Posts: 23623
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:06 pm
- Location: ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
I can't believe there's so much riding on this game! In a mini slump, first derby against the sloppies in ages, live on the telly, both sides really needing the win...
Really hope the team is up for this one. :D
Really hope the team is up for this one. :D
-
belgiansaddler - Site Addict
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:45 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Exile wrote:I can't believe there's so much riding on this game! In a mini slump, first derby against the sloppies in ages, live on the telly, both sides really needing the win...
Really hope the team is up for this one. :D
Can't think about any of that yet Exile, I need a breakfast roll first
-
IHTC. - Site Addict
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: West Bromwich
-
Graydon48 - Glitterati
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:49 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
That is the worse security bag check ever. "any bottles cans ?" "
"no i reply , want to check?". "I believe you" he replies.
"no i reply , want to check?". "I believe you" he replies.
-
kevin - UTS Legend
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:46 pm
- Location: Location,Location.
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
For those who don't know,if you ain't got Sky, you can view here................http://www.vipboxsports.eu/football/805 ... nline.html
-
wivenj - UTS Veteran
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:52 pm
- Location: KINGS 17;7.
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Playing great lads.........responding everytime by our very loud 3rd man who sound v ery loud. CC...........COME ON
- BarnsleySaddler
- Glitterati
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:42 pm
- Location: Still living in the dark back in Barnsley
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Typical, all the play and now 1-0 nil down. Rats.
- BarnsleySaddler
- Glitterati
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:42 pm
- Location: Still living in the dark back in Barnsley
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Shrewsbury under the cosh only one shot on target and now in front. Time for Smith to earn his money and get a result out of this. Common the lads.
-
boringteacher - UTS Legend
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:50 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Thrashing the sheeploving inbreds and still losing! The first 25 minutes was magnificent, as well as I've seen them play this year - but we didn't score. The bloke next to me at Bescot always says we need one more to win when we go 1-0 up. Afraid its true, we aint going to keep many clean sheets if we defend like that at a corner.
Cmon Boys!
(btw - wiziwig has loads of good flash links if the one you're on bombs out)
Cmon Boys!
(btw - wiziwig has loads of good flash links if the one you're on bombs out)
-
SaigonSaddler - Site Addict
- Posts: 10825
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: In Bonser's Grotto
-
Wendy Mumford - UTS Veteran
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:19 pm
- Location: Park Hall
-
wivenj - UTS Veteran
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:52 pm
- Location: KINGS 17;7.
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
I admit I haven't seen us live for a while......My observations are no strength and so desperate for a strong centre midfield and striker . Good effort shame.
- Port_Vale
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:03 am
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
First half i Thought you should Of gone in at the break in front.
You've got no cutting edge at all.
This is a poor Shrewsbury side as well. It might be just one of them days, but after watching you Tuesday against a league 2 side ( we are equally as good as half in league 1) you clearly need a striker. Where's that grigg?
If hemmings is a league 1 player then so am I. Awful.
You've got no cutting edge at all.
This is a poor Shrewsbury side as well. It might be just one of them days, but after watching you Tuesday against a league 2 side ( we are equally as good as half in league 1) you clearly need a striker. Where's that grigg?
If hemmings is a league 1 player then so am I. Awful.
-
chestersaddler - Site Addict
- Posts: 10191
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Europe
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Port_Vale wrote:First half i Thought you should Of gone in at the break in front.
You've got no cutting edge at all.
This is a poor Shrewsbury side as well. It might be just one of them days, but after watching you Tuesday against a league 2 side ( we are equally as good as half in league 1) you clearly need a striker. Where's that grigg?
If hemmings is a league 1 player then so am I. Awful.
Agree with all of that apart from it's "should HAVE" :wink:
- BarnsleySaddler
- Glitterati
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:42 pm
- Location: Still living in the dark back in Barnsley
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
After this utter horror of a result when so much on top especially in the first half just shows what another hard season awaits us after the fruits of the first few matches have died. Only way now seems downward ever faster. :( :(
- SWS1
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
What a bloody travesty. Walsall played good football all the way through and coudn't get the ball in the net. What a travesty. I'm absolutely gutted that a poor Sloppies team could get the one lucky break and we couldn't get a goal for love nor money.
GUTTED!
:evil:
GUTTED!
:evil:
- Registered Saddler
- UTS Legend
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:24 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
I don't understand the lack of cutting edge comments. If you mean no ruthlessness in front of goal then I agree, but it wasn't for a lack of clear cut chances. We must have had four or five in that game, not to mention the shots from Cuvelier and Paterson. It might look like we don't create much just because of the amount of possession we have.
Taundry is dire. How dare he shoot at the end when we were crying out for a cross into the box? Every time he touched it we looked approximately 50% worse. I lost count of the amount of times a team-mate was demanding he play it short and he kicked a long ball straight at a Shrewsbury player. Holden did most of his defending at right-back too. If ever a team had a weak link, it's him.
On the positive side, it was good to have Chambers back. Improved us no end IMO.
Taundry is dire. How dare he shoot at the end when we were crying out for a cross into the box? Every time he touched it we looked approximately 50% worse. I lost count of the amount of times a team-mate was demanding he play it short and he kicked a long ball straight at a Shrewsbury player. Holden did most of his defending at right-back too. If ever a team had a weak link, it's him.
On the positive side, it was good to have Chambers back. Improved us no end IMO.
-
boringteacher - UTS Legend
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:50 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
No way a deserved defeat, probably should have been a victory though the sheeprapists were probably just the better team in the 2nd half.
Good game against a poor team (looked 4th div still). My real concern was that our striking options were Williams and Brandy ffs. WE NEED A F***ING STRIKER!
Good game against a poor team (looked 4th div still). My real concern was that our striking options were Williams and Brandy ffs. WE NEED A F***ING STRIKER!
-
chestersaddler - Site Addict
- Posts: 10191
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Europe
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Registered Saddler wrote:I don't understand the lack of cutting edge comments. If you mean no ruthlessness in front of goal then I agree, but it wasn't for a lack of clear cut chances. We must have had four or five in that game, not to mention the shots from Cuvelier and Paterson. It might look like we don't create much just because of the amount of possession we have.
Taundry is dire. How dare he shoot at the end when we were crying out for a cross into the box? Every time he touched it we looked approximately 50% worse. I lost count of the amount of times a team-mate was demanding he play it short and he kicked a long ball straight at a Shrewsbury player. Holden did most of his defending at right-back too. If ever a team had a weak link, it's him.
On the positive side, it was good to have Chambers back. Improved us no end IMO.
That is what I mean by lack of cutting edge. Poor finishing and the inability to get players in the six yard box is the problem. Two x one on ones today and numerous other attempts on goal without an end product.
- Registered Saddler
- UTS Legend
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:24 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
chestersaddler wrote:Registered Saddler wrote:I don't understand the lack of cutting edge comments. If you mean no ruthlessness in front of goal then I agree, but it wasn't for a lack of clear cut chances. We must have had four or five in that game, not to mention the shots from Cuvelier and Paterson. It might look like we don't create much just because of the amount of possession we have.
Taundry is dire. How dare he shoot at the end when we were crying out for a cross into the box? Every time he touched it we looked approximately 50% worse. I lost count of the amount of times a team-mate was demanding he play it short and he kicked a long ball straight at a Shrewsbury player. Holden did most of his defending at right-back too. If ever a team had a weak link, it's him.
On the positive side, it was good to have Chambers back. Improved us no end IMO.
That is what I mean by lack of cutting edge. Poor finishing and the inability to get players in the six yard box is the problem. Two x one on ones today and numerous other attempts on goal without an end product.
Yeah, I'd agree. Chambers was the worst miss - most times you'd expect Bowerman to score his chance. But Grigg, Paterson and Cuvelier haven't found their shooting boots yet this season.
-
motty - UTS Legend
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:27 pm
- Location: Walsall ay it.
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Hi my names james paterson and when im not trying to run past 3 players im shooting from the half way line. Drop him now utter shite.Please dont argue with me because you are wrong.
- m&m
- Glitterati
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:23 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Great first half but if you don't take your chances this is what happens.chambers chance was criminal and the writingwas on the wall. Second half Turner sussed us out and they probably should have won by more especially after our substitutions. We really have a thin squad. Brandy and Hemmings are not good enough and both seem to have a very bad attitude.Get rid of both very quickly!
-
geoffwhiting - Site Addict
- Posts: 4448
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:02 pm
- Location: on the Walsall/Chasetown border
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
SWS1 wrote:What a bloody travesty. Walsall played good football all the way through and coudn't get the ball in the net. What a travesty. I'm absolutely gutted that a poor Sloppies team could get the one lucky break and we couldn't get a goal for love nor money.
GUTTED!
:evil:
Missed chances and decent goal-keeping cost us very dear, but it stands out a mile that we are far too lightweight up front, and for all the excellent passing football I think we'll continue to struggle unless we strengthen with a player that can hold the ball up front and bring others into play.
Particularly galling that Shrewsbury deserved nothing and took all three points, but that will happen too many times this season if we stay as we are.
Just hope Cuvelier will be back next game, because we lost a lot of presence when he went off.
Definitely three more points chucked away for me, criminal.
- BathSaddler
- Site Addict
- Posts: 3914
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: Bath
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
How frustrating was that? We should have been three up in the first 15 minutes, and it was always going to be difficult to keep that momentum going with no end product. Cuvelier being clattered several times and going off injured was a significant point in the game, his replacement Hemmings looking like he could not give a flying proverbial. Perhaps he thinks he should be in the starting line up? Perhaps he should have a stern look at himself because he was poor overall today.
Good support by the sounds of it, at a venue that has as little atmosphere as our own.
Very disappointed in the result, but at least we are trying to play the right way.
Good support by the sounds of it, at a venue that has as little atmosphere as our own.
Very disappointed in the result, but at least we are trying to play the right way.
Last edited by BathSaddler on Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BathSaddler
- Site Addict
- Posts: 3914
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: Bath
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
motty wrote:Hi my names james paterson and when im not trying to run past 3 players im shooting from the half way line. Drop him now utter guano.Please dont argue with me because you are wrong.
He is very frustrating to watch, to say the least. But give me him over Hemmings all day long.
- SWS1
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
motty wrote:Hi my names james paterson and when im not trying to run past 3 players im shooting from the half way line. Drop him now utter guano.Please dont argue with me because you are wrong.
No. Don't do that. JUST GIVE THE KID A BIT OFCOACHING. I agree with your comment about him shooting from everywhere, Motty, but team orders should knock that on the head.
Now that I have had time for more mature and measured reflection on the game we just lost, I think I can say that, on the whole, overall, and taking all events into account, including the fact that the ref for once was half decent (although he didn't have to make any peno decisions), so, yes, I can say with all due consideration
I'M STILL BLOODY GUTTED
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: etc
- m&m
- Glitterati
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:23 pm
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Bath Saddler is spot on. Paterson at least tries. I hate footballers like Hemmings. Arrogant/chip etc....
-
Neuromantic - Site Addict
- Posts: 6548
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:11 pm
- Location: Rotate!
Re: Shrewsbury Town (a) - Sun 14/10/12
Once again we look toothless up front. We were devoid of any ideas when Flo and Baxo went Off.
But more importantly more rubbish substitutions by Smith. Serious questions must be asked. Not good enough.
Nicky Featherstone is class.
Jamie Paterson is rubbish.
O'Kelly in.
But more importantly more rubbish substitutions by Smith. Serious questions must be asked. Not good enough.
Nicky Featherstone is class.
Jamie Paterson is rubbish.
O'Kelly in.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests