philthesaddler wrote:You know what, maybe we should have tried to have a man sent off? That would have given us a boost.
We tried having a man sent off tactic last week.
philthesaddler wrote:You know what, maybe we should have tried to have a man sent off? That would have given us a boost.
Duke wrote:Face facts we have a owner chairman who doesn't attend games anymore , according to Jeff we've had the most successful 20 year period in the clubs history under him.
We have a owner chairman who clearly doesn't give a toss about the club or the fans.
We have a manager who couldn't organize an orgy in an brothel.
I repeat we are going down
swiftyboy wrote:I'm SICK OF SAYING THIS!!!!!!!!
Hutchings is only the short term problem. It's BONER that's to blame full stop. What happens when Hutchings goes? Bonser employs another cheapskate yes man manager, and so it all begins again
Stu wrote:swiftyboy wrote:I'm SICK OF SAYING THIS!!!!!!!!
Hutchings is only the short term problem. It's BONER that's to blame full stop. What happens when Hutchings goes? Bonser employs another cheapskate yes man manager, and so it all begins again
I don't think you'll find one person who disagrees, but as I imagine everyone else is sick of saying, unless you've got £6m - £10m down the back of your sofa, then there is no point harping on about it.
swiftyboy wrote:Stu wrote:swiftyboy wrote:I'm SICK OF SAYING THIS!!!!!!!!
Hutchings is only the short term problem. It's BONER that's to blame full stop. What happens when Hutchings goes? Bonser employs another cheapskate yes man manager, and so it all begins again
I don't think you'll find one person who disagrees, but as I imagine everyone else is sick of saying, unless you've got £6m - £10m down the back of your sofa, then there is no point harping on about it.
Oh great. I'll look forward to watching Bonser appoint another yes man to take us back to square one then
Stu wrote:swiftyboy wrote:I'm SICK OF SAYING THIS!!!!!!!!
Hutchings is only the short term problem. It's BONER that's to blame full stop. What happens when Hutchings goes? Bonser employs another cheapskate yes man manager, and so it all begins again
I don't think you'll find one person who disagrees, but as I imagine everyone else is sick of saying, unless you've got £6m - £10m down the back of your sofa, then there is no point harping on about it.
swiftyboy wrote:Stu wrote:swiftyboy wrote:I'm SICK OF SAYING THIS!!!!!!!!
Hutchings is only the short term problem. It's BONER that's to blame full stop. What happens when Hutchings goes? Bonser employs another cheapskate yes man manager, and so it all begins again
I don't think you'll find one person who disagrees, but as I imagine everyone else is sick of saying, unless you've got £6m - £10m down the back of your sofa, then there is no point harping on about it.
Oh great. I'll look forward to watching Bonser appoint another yes man to take us back to square one then
Exile wrote:Match reaction now on the front page.
http://upthesaddlers.com/wp/archives/20 ... ll-it-end/
Exile wrote:Match reaction now on the front page.
http://upthesaddlers.com/wp/archives/20 ... ll-it-end/
BathSaddler wrote:There were 159 Saddlers at Dean Court yesterday.
tinned wrote:Duke wrote:Face facts we have a owner chairman who doesn't attend games anymore , according to Jeff we've had the most successful 20 year period in the clubs history under him.
We have a owner chairman who clearly doesn't give a toss about the club or the fans.
We have a manager who couldn't organize an orgy in an brothel.
I repeat we are going down
You've come a long way in the last couple of years. Back then you were still repeating the favourite myths about Bonser saving us and being our number one fan :wink:
Banksy wrote:BathSaddler wrote:There were 159 Saddlers at Dean Court yesterday.
Fair play to each and every one of them, im glad i was working otherwise i would have most probably also wasted £19. Heard Dickinson was a waste of space again. Hutchings is right about him he does add a new dimension, were even worse with him in the side! HUTCHINGS OUT!
portlandbill wrote:Banksy wrote:BathSaddler wrote:There were 159 Saddlers at Dean Court yesterday.
Fair play to each and every one of them, im glad i was working otherwise i would have most probably also wasted £19. Heard Dickinson was a waste of space again. Hutchings is right about him he does add a new dimension, were even worse with him in the side! HUTCHINGS OUT!
In fair play to Dickinson he was a loan striker and I do mean LONE. Not that he looked any good, but it would be nice to see him get a cross or pass in the box. Alan Shearer would have looked bad yesterday in that team with those 'tactics'.
portlandbill wrote:Hutchins tactics were plain to see. set the team up to frustrate the home team. looking for a nil nil .However he was unable to change the system even when we were three nil down. Right until the end we were playing for nil nil.
DanWalsallFC wrote:We look terrible when it comes to defending crosses. Work on defending them Hutch!
BathSaddler wrote:There were 159 Saddlers at Dean Court yesterday.
longdogs wrote:Brian Halford in the Evening Mail rated Gray as a 1/10 :lol: :lol:
The rest got 5s and 6s. Was he really that bad?
http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/walsall-fc/walsall-fc-news/2010/11/15/after-walsall-lose-again-at-bournemouth-brian-halford-asks-have-these-players-got-the-stomach-for-a-relegation-fight-97319-27657646/
ws3 wrote:longdogs wrote:Brian Halford in the Evening Mail rated Gray as a 1/10 :lol: :lol:
The rest got 5s and 6s. Was he really that bad?
http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/walsall-fc/walsall-fc-news/2010/11/15/after-walsall-lose-again-at-bournemouth-brian-halford-asks-have-these-players-got-the-stomach-for-a-relegation-fight-97319-27657646/
Yes he was. 1/10 is just being polite.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests