Chomper wrote:So, in summary...
Not too bad - we're almost there
:wink: :wink: :roll: :roll: :shock: :? :cry: :cry: :cry:
:mrgreen:
Chomper wrote:So, in summary...
Not too bad - we're almost there
:wink: :wink: :roll: :roll: :shock: :? :cry: :cry: :cry:
Bangor Cymru Saddler wrote:I have been critical of Ishmel in the past but to play a right back on the left wing instead of him is truly horrific. To not play Marco Reich; and play Troy Deeney for me is an absolutely ridiculous way of going about things. Please tell me if im being an idiot... but is:
Ishmel Bradley Mattis Reich
better than:
Palmer Mattis Taundry Deeney
Am I missing something ????? :evil:
saddlerken wrote:smug and childish
Money for example would have sat back but would have had a better organised defence if Money is not a chaeap option, which, btw he was
If you are quite happy that we lost then continue to stay away
geoffwhiting wrote:saddlerken wrote:smug and childish
Money for example would have sat back but would have had a better organised defence if Money is not a chaeap option, which, btw he was
If you are quite happy that we lost then continue to stay away
And just why would I, or anyone else on here, be happy that we lost?
Angry is what I am, and certainly NOT the slightest bit happy.
BTW, If you wish to describe yourself as smug and childish that's fine, but really unnecessary. However, you ought to desist from suggesting that I'm not entitled to comment just because I "don't go".
saddlerken wrote:geoffwhiting wrote:saddlerken wrote:smug and childish
Money for example would have sat back but would have had a better organised defence if Money is not a chaeap option, which, btw he was
If you are quite happy that we lost then continue to stay away
And just why would I, or anyone else on here, be happy that we lost?
Angry is what I am, and certainly NOT the slightest bit happy.
BTW, If you wish to describe yourself as smug and childish that's fine, but really unnecessary. However, you ought to desist from suggesting that I'm not entitled to comment just because I "don't go".
You comment more now than you did when you went
saddlerken wrote:agree with the majority of this, however Neil, you cannot compare anyone to the drunk that was in charge, he should always be on his own as worst manager in the history of WFC
Neil Ravenscroft wrote:saddlerken wrote:agree with the majority of this, however Neil, you cannot compare anyone to the drunk that was in charge, he should always be on his own as worst manager in the history of WFC
Really? Think back to a 2 - 3 home defeat to Chesterfield after leading 2 - 0. The game went in exactly the same way.
cal wfc fan wrote:Apparently Hughes was off sick with flu.
Duke wrote:cal wfc fan wrote:Apparently Hughes was off sick with flu.
thanks for that , just caught the goals on the championship shocking defending .
saddlerken wrote:geoffwhiting wrote:saddlerken wrote:smug and childish
Money for example would have sat back but would have had a better organised defence if Money is not a chaeap option, which, btw he was
If you are quite happy that we lost then continue to stay away
And just why would I, or anyone else on here, be happy that we lost?
Angry is what I am, and certainly NOT the slightest bit happy.
BTW, If you wish to describe yourself as smug and childish that's fine, but really unnecessary. However, you ought to desist from suggesting that I'm not entitled to comment just because I "don't go".
You comment more now than you did when you went
WFC_Rob wrote:Just another thing to add, which I don't think has been commented on yet - what exactly do the players and management do in training?
The fact that we had, and haven't had so far this season, any sort of plan B is there for all to see. Looking past that though, we looked completely short of anything resembling organisation or structure.
Last week, Peterborough's sharpness in and around the box was a joy to watch - that's obviously something they work on in training. Similarly, Hartlepool's working of the ball when they had the opportunities to catch us on the break were well planned.
All we have to offer is huff, puff & a hope that Jabo or Ricketts will conjure something up from nothing.
Duke wrote:another thing worrying me , how many players are going to perform for a manager who slags them off in public , that's poor man management imo .
is Mullen losing the dressing room if that happens we are on a slippery slope
WFC_Rob wrote:Just another thing to add, which I don't think has been commented on yet - what exactly do the players and management do in training?
The fact that we didn't have, and haven't had so far this season, any sort of plan B is there for all to see. Looking past that though, we looked completely short of anything resembling organisation or structure.
Last week, Peterborough's sharpness in and around the box was a joy to watch - that's obviously something they work on in training. Similarly, Hartlepool's working of the ball when they had the opportunities to catch us on the break were well planned.
All we have to offer is huff, puff & a hope that Jabo or Ricketts will conjure something up from nothing.
ToeJoe Jnr wrote:The worrying thing is our defending against PBoro was woeful and we had a week to work on it!!! It was equally bad yesterday, and we have Fryatt to face on Tuesday!!!
H wrote:I think Palmer is being harshly treated. He is lightweight but defintley has quality on the ball.
saddlerken wrote:geoffwhiting wrote:saddlerken wrote:smug and childish
Money for example would have sat back but would have had a better organised defence if Money is not a chaeap option, which, btw he was
If you are quite happy that we lost then continue to stay away
And just why would I, or anyone else on here, be happy that we lost?
Angry is what I am, and certainly NOT the slightest bit happy.
BTW, If you wish to describe yourself as smug and childish that's fine, but really unnecessary. However, you ought to desist from suggesting that I'm not entitled to comment just because I "don't go".
You comment more now than you did when you went
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests