Exile wrote:Just one thought, cowshed, how much has Walsall been heldback because Walsall folk keep going to Villa instead of the Banks's's? Think your argument is spurious in that respect.
I really don't see what relevance whatsoever this has, or why it should cause us to hold any ill feelings towards the Villa (or any of our neighbours) or their fans.
Every one of us has free choice, and we exercise it as we see fit. If anyone within the Walsall boundary looks on Villa (or any of our neighbours) as offering better value, better football, better opposition, better facilities or just simply a better experience, then why shouldn't they take (what they see as) the better option?
Like all the other clubs around here, we were founded in the late 1800s, and have had similar opportunities to grow from the start like Villa, B'ham City, Wolves and the Albion have. But we didn't. They didn't really have a head start on us, we just fell behind while they attracted more followers and grew into bigger clubs, presumably through better management and ambition. Is that the fault of all of those clubs? Were they not just doing what any business should do? Are they not still doing that today?
Or is it the fault of the succession of owners of Walsall FC, who presumably didn't set their sights as high (still don't), showed less ambition to grow like our neighbours, and consequently ended up as the poor relations, and as a result offering a poorer product at a lower level and therefore understandably attracting fewer followers?
Yes, Walsall FC has been held back because of the Walsall people who cross the boundaries to watch football at our neighbours' grounds, and some even further afield. So what? That's not the problem, or at least it's only a small part of it, and remember, there are people who cross the boundaries in the other direction to come to Bescot and follow the Saddlers, so it's not a one-way system.
The problem at Walsall FC now is that its management don't even do enough to retain the fans that we have had (me included), and it is entirely in THEIR hands to provide a team on the pitch that is good enough to make us feel it is worthwhile returning to The Banks's to watch. It is also entirely in their (or maybe HIS) hands to make fans like me feel part of a club that has ambition to succeed, NOT ambition to plod along just sufficiently to keep paying the equivalent of £1,000 a day in rent into the pension fund.
None of this is the fault of our neighbours, and the "anti" against them makes no sense in the face of the real facts of the matter, that they are not to blame, and that our decline is totally self-inflicted from the top of the Bescot board-room.