IHTC. wrote:500 away fans, rather pathetic but there was a small group of people who refused to come due to our pricing of games for away fans especially for juniors.
and the fact they havent won in Walsall for 20 years. Apparently.
IHTC. wrote:500 away fans, rather pathetic but there was a small group of people who refused to come due to our pricing of games for away fans especially for juniors.
latviancheese wrote:IHTC. wrote:500 away fans, rather pathetic but there was a small group of people who refused to come due to our pricing of games for away fans especially for juniors.
and the fact they havent won in Walsall for 20 years. Apparently.
latviancheese wrote:Judging by the highlights i stand by my first thoughts.
Only sending off was the challenge on Westcarr. Which wasn't even given as a foul. How their man got sent off is baffling, quite frankly.
WFC_Rob wrote:latviancheese wrote:Judging by the highlights i stand by my first thoughts.
Only sending off was the challenge on Westcarr. Which wasn't even given as a foul. How their man got sent off is baffling, quite frankly.
Similar view to mine - watching in telly, the red card didn't seem as bad as it did at the time, but the tackle on Westcarr seemed a lot worse. The only thing I would add is that James Chambers isn't the sort to feign injury to get someone sent off, and it wasn't the cleverest of tackles.
Guest wrote:No way will we win this! We have forgotten how to win...
...at home.
aaaae wrote:Westcarr's reaction was nothing short of moronic.
tinned wrote:aaaae wrote:Westcarr's reaction was nothing short of moronic.
I agree. Pathetic way for a professional footballer to behave.
this is the most disappointing part of following walsall, some people just cant wait to have a go at their own players, little wonder they cant wait to get away at the end of the season.
bigbadsad wrote:it was a good tackle on westcarr not a foul if you look westcarr bottles the challenge and the there players slips as he is winning the ball so it makes it look worse than it was
JonnyOwen wrote:bigbadsad wrote:it was a good tackle on westcarr not a foul if you look westcarr bottles the challenge and the there players slips as he is winning the ball so it makes it look worse than it was
If it was a good challenge why did he need 7 stitches? Did he blade himself like he is in the WWE?
SWS1 wrote:Noted the foul count, too (Oops! Almost missed the O out of "count"!) Walsall committed 5 Shroos 14 :shock: Shocking.
martkrugeleysaddler wrote:Their blue and amber forum makes for some smug reading, complaining they can't compete with us financially!
WarsawPact wrote:Wonder what was said to Westcarr.
I'm sure Carl Ikeme heard - maybe he can be persuaded to let on...
martkrugeleysaddler wrote:Their blue and amber forum makes for some smug reading, complaining they can't compete with us financially!
Super Gabor wrote:As much as we love Butler, for a ref-in-training and an example-setting captain, can he learn not to give all the back chat he hands out to refs?
martkrugeleysaddler wrote:Their blue and amber forum makes for some smug reading, complaining they can't compete with us financially!
WFC_Rob wrote:Super Gabor wrote:As much as we love Butler, for a ref-in-training and an example-setting captain, can he learn not to give all the back chat he hands out to refs?
I don't really understand what the issue is if I'm honest. If he is 'back chatting', he rarely gets booked for it, and he's supposed to be allowed a certain degree of contact with the referee as our captain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests