Welcome. This site is an archived version of the previous UpTheSaddlers forum (December 2004 to May 2018). To visit the new UTS website, please click here.

Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Reports and reaction from the 2012-2013 season as Walsall finished 9th in League 1
Forum rules
no avoiding the language filter, no text speak, no breaking the rules
User avatar
WFC_Rob
Site Addict
 
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Birmingham/Shrewsbury

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Mon Apr 22, 2013 6:40 pm

latviancheese wrote:Its the draws ay it.

How many draws did we manage to get from winning positions during the bad run? Gotta be at least 6/9 points dropped there, along with Bury and Hartlepool etc.

Yep, Brentford, Crewe and Yeovil - all home games we drew having been 2 goals up. All came in fairly quick succession too, which shows how fragile we were back then, despite the fact that two of those three have ended up in the top six.

latviancheese
Site Addict
 
Posts: 13000
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:35 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:46 pm

Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

User avatar
King Crimson
Poet Laureate
 
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: In the Wake of Poseidon

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:44 am

latviancheese wrote:Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

No. Dropping Taundry was. He played a fair number of games in the earlier part of the season. I think it's easy to forget that, given he hasn't featured at all - even as a sub - in our decent run.

User avatar
WFC_Rob
Site Addict
 
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Birmingham/Shrewsbury

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:40 am

King Crimson wrote:
latviancheese wrote:Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

No. Dropping Taundry was. He played a fair number of games in the earlier part of the season. I think it's easy to forget that, given he hasn't featured at all - even as a sub - in our decent run.

I think both were. Having Taundry in the side showed that even at our relatively lowly level, if a scout identifies a weakness, you'll be made to pay for it. I lost count of the number of times Taundry was noticeably singled out by the team he was playing against. Someone should have just put him out of his misery at the Ricoh - he was absolutely crucified.

User avatar
IHTC.
Site Addict
 
Posts: 5389
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:08 pm
Location: West Bromwich

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:32 am

WFC_Rob wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
latviancheese wrote:Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

No. Dropping Taundry was. He played a fair number of games in the earlier part of the season. I think it's easy to forget that, given he hasn't featured at all - even as a sub - in our decent run.

I think both were. Having Taundry in the side showed that even at our relatively lowly level, if a scout identifies a weakness, you'll be made to pay for it. I lost count of the number of times Taundry was noticeably singled out by the team he was playing against. Someone should have just put him out of his misery at the Ricoh - he was absolutely crucified.


Smith put us out of our misery by not picking him again

User avatar
tinned
Site Addict
 
Posts: 10023
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:49 pm
Location: Same poo, different day!

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:08 pm

IHTC. wrote:
WFC_Rob wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
latviancheese wrote:Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

No. Dropping Taundry was. He played a fair number of games in the earlier part of the season. I think it's easy to forget that, given he hasn't featured at all - even as a sub - in our decent run.

I think both were. Having Taundry in the side showed that even at our relatively lowly level, if a scout identifies a weakness, you'll be made to pay for it. I lost count of the number of times Taundry was noticeably singled out by the team he was playing against. Someone should have just put him out of his misery at the Ricoh - he was absolutely crucified.


Smith put us out of our misery by not picking him again


Smith extended our misery by offering him another contract.

User avatar
Magic Man Fan
Site Addict
 
Posts: 10977
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Warning. Some posts may cause offence...to the over sensitive or slow.

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:04 pm

tinned wrote:
IHTC. wrote:
WFC_Rob wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
latviancheese wrote:Also funny how weak the backbone was then, and now, its probably one of our strengths. Sadly, dropping Holden was the the best thing that happened to us this year.

No. Dropping Taundry was. He played a fair number of games in the earlier part of the season. I think it's easy to forget that, given he hasn't featured at all - even as a sub - in our decent run.

I think both were. Having Taundry in the side showed that even at our relatively lowly level, if a scout identifies a weakness, you'll be made to pay for it. I lost count of the number of times Taundry was noticeably singled out by the team he was playing against. Someone should have just put him out of his misery at the Ricoh - he was absolutely crucified.


Smith put us out of our misery by not picking him again


Smith extended our misery by offering him another contract.


Needs must. Low budget meant keeping a low paid player that could come in, in a variety of positions.

Now he's got a better squad together he hasn't got to take as many gambles on the likes of Taundry.

SWS1
 

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:31 pm

latviancheese wrote:Its the draws ay it.

How many draws did we manage to get from winning positions during the bad run? Gotta be at least 6/9 points dropped there, along with Bury and Hartlepool etc.

Dead roight. Oi bin sayin' it fer weeks. And we still kept drorin.
:evil:

Seriously, surely some Statto can tell us, definitively, how many points we threw away in the last, shall we say 10 minutes of games, versus the number we claimed in that same period (because there were a few). I'm too idle to do it myself but I would guess it's about 12 points we chucked away and about 5 we gained. Someone must know the real answer. :wink:

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:17 pm

SWS1 wrote:
latviancheese wrote:Its the draws ay it.

How many draws did we manage to get from winning positions during the bad run? Gotta be at least 6/9 points dropped there, along with Bury and Hartlepool etc.

Dead roight. Oi bin sayin' it fer weeks. And we still kept drorin.
:evil:

Seriously, surely some Statto can tell us, definitively, how many points we threw away in the last, shall we say 10 minutes of games, versus the number we claimed in that same period (because there were a few). I'm too idle to do it myself but I would guess it's about 12 points we chucked away and about 5 we gained. Someone must know the real answer. :wink:


Wow, your guess is very good.

I make it 7 points dropped due to goals in injury time (included games where Walsall benefitted from late goals, to make it a fair comparison)

Brentford H (-2) Points dropped/gained
Bournemouth A (+2)
Carlisle H (-1)
Crewe H (-2)
Yeovil H (-2)
Crawley H (+1)
Swindon A (+1)
Scunthorpe A (-2)
Bury H (-2)

Total (-7)

latviancheese
Site Addict
 
Posts: 13000
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:35 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:23 pm

7 points dropped probably from about a point a minute.

Its a 90 minute game :lol:

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:34 pm

It was results against teams at the bottom of the table that cost us.
really low PPG if you exclude Portsmouth

P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Colchester United 14 6 4 4 6 5 16 11 +5 22 1.57
2 Oldham Athletic 14 6 4 4 4 2 18 14 +4 22 1.57
3 Bury 14 5 5 4 2 4 17 17 0 20 1.43
4 Scunthorpe United 14 5 4 5 4 3 16 15 +1 19 1.36
5 Walsall 14 4 6 4 3 3 15 17 -2 18 1.29
6 Shrewsbury Town 14 3 8 3 5 5 13 14 -1 17 1.21
7 Stevenage 14 5 2 7 4 5 13 15 -2 17 1.21
8 Hartlepool United 14 3 5 6 4 5 13 18 -5 14 1.00

If we include Portsmouth it does look a bit better, but still not good enough

P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Oldham Athletic 1 4 7 4 3 6 1 18 12 +6 25 1.79
2 Walsall 14 5 6 3 3 3 17 15 +2 21 1.50
3 Colchester United 14 5 5 4 4 5 18 15 +3 20 1.43
4 Scunthorpe United 14 5 4 5 3 2 18 17 +1 19 1.36
5 Bury 14 5 4 5 2 5 15 17 -2 19 1.36
6 Hartlepool United 14 4 6 4 5 4 16 16 0 18 1.29
7 Shrewsbury Town 13 2 7 4 5 5 11 15 -4 13 1.00
8 Portsmouth 13 3 2 8 2 5 14 20 -6 11 0.85

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:36 pm

P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Sheffield United 14 6 6 2 8 5 16 12 +4 24 1.71
2 Doncaster Rovers13 6 4 3 5 2 18 11 +7 22 1.69
3 Leyton Orient 14 6 3 5 4 7 15 16 -1 21 1.50
4 Yeovil Town 14 5 3 6 4 5 18 20 -2 18 1.29
5 Swindon Town 14 4 5 5 5 6 17 12 +5 17 1.21
6 Brentford 13 3 6 4 4 4 15 18 -3 15 1.15
7 Walsall 14 3 6 5 2 5 16 20 -4 15 1.07
8 Bournemouth 14 4 3 7 5 3 17 23 -6 15 1.07

For comparison here is the record against the top teams. I must admit it looks worse than I thought it would.

But then Bournemouth are bottom! and they have gone up, which proves my point about getting points against the bottom teams

User avatar
longdogs
UTS Legend
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Longdon

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:45 pm

Worsul wrote:It was results against teams at the bottom of the table that cost us.
really low PPG if you exclude Portsmouth

I'm not sure why you would exclude Portsmouth from the teams at the bottom of the table. I know we did the double over them, but there's no more reason to exclude favourable results than unfavourable ones.

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:52 pm

longdogs wrote:
Worsul wrote:It was results against teams at the bottom of the table that cost us.
really low PPG if you exclude Portsmouth

I'm not sure why you would exclude Portsmouth from the teams at the bottom of the table. I know we did the double over them, but there's no more reason to exclude favourable results than unfavourable ones.


Fair point. I think I was trying to show that Pompey were the only team we took 4 or more points from out of the bottom 8 teams. If you want to make the play offs you would hope to get 2 points per game off the teams at the bottom.

User avatar
longdogs
UTS Legend
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Longdon

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:55 pm

Are you able to do a table showing how, say, the top 8 performed against the bottom 8? I have no idea how you're putting these together, so if its a lot of work, don't worry, just interested.

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:01 pm

longdogs wrote:Are you able to do a table showing how, say, the top 8 performed against the bottom 8? I have no idea how you're putting these together, so if its a lot of work, don't worry, just interested.



Go to www.statto.com and you can select group comparison for any 8 teams

latviancheese
Site Addict
 
Posts: 13000
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:35 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:15 pm

Stats rule.

User avatar
Neil Ravenscroft
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5605
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Replacement Baby Is Here!

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:00 am

latviancheese wrote:Stats rule.

Only if you interpret their meaning correctly. Mine would be we struggled against teams that set out to squeeze space, meaning we couldn't play our passing game. What we didn't have was a player to bring on to change things. A plan B.

We-ARE-Walsall
Site Addict
 
Posts: 8041
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:23 am
Location: Fighting for the town.

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:11 am

You can talk about individual matches all you like, but the real downfall of our season, has been our inability to see out a game. We have been in winning positions so many times, and failed to win, 3 times in recent weeks, and that isn't even the half of it. Hopefully this will come as Deano gets more experienced. Graydon and Money made their names at Walsall by doing it, it's all very nice playing sexy football, but we still have to win games.

wfc & chips
Glitterati
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: burton skatepark as often as not

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:22 am

the weakness of the squad against the strength of the 1st team is a huge factor. for example, our 1st choice centre-halves are great, their deputy awful. after our upturn, whenever any of our 1st choices were out (brandy, grigg, butler, taylor), we sorely missed them.

User avatar
WFC_Rob
Site Addict
 
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Birmingham/Shrewsbury

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:39 am

wfc & chips wrote:the weakness of the squad against the strength of the 1st team is a huge factor. for example, our 1st choice centre-halves are great, their deputy awful. after our upturn, whenever any of our 1st choices were out (brandy, grigg, butler, taylor), we sorely missed them.

To an extent though, that's the nature of being a League One football club. Aside from the Bournemouths, Sheffield Utds and MK Dons of the league, the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis.

If the dream scenario comes together and we manage to keep our existing squad together, my wish list would consist of a couple of goalies, a good centre half to replace the ageing Dean Holden, and a striker with a little more experience than Bowerman. Tempting them down to the Banks's on the proviso that they'll be second choice won't be an easy task though.

Oh to have the luxury of a couple of Darren Wracks or Neil Emblens in the squad, who could come into the side and do a job pretty much anywhere.

User avatar
WarsawPact
UTS Legend
 
Posts: 1645
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:43 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:08 pm

WFC_Rob wrote:
wfc & chips wrote:...the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis...


Which is what happened to Tranmere.

User avatar
WFC_Rob
Site Addict
 
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Birmingham/Shrewsbury

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:01 pm

WarsawPact wrote:
WFC_Rob wrote:
wfc & chips wrote:...the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis...


Which is what happened to Tranmere.

Exactly. Smith and Whitney deserve credit for our steering clear of injuries this season. One of the benefits of a young squad and a good training regime.

Tranmere were always going to struggle to keep Andy Robinson fit for a full season. :lol:

wfc & chips
Glitterati
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: burton skatepark as often as not

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:14 pm

WFC_Rob wrote:
wfc & chips wrote:the weakness of the squad against the strength of the 1st team is a huge factor. for example, our 1st choice centre-halves are great, their deputy awful. after our upturn, whenever any of our 1st choices were out (brandy, grigg, butler, taylor), we sorely missed them.

To an extent though, that's the nature of being a League One football club. Aside from the Bournemouths, Sheffield Utds and MK Dons of the league, the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis.

If the dream scenario comes together and we manage to keep our existing squad together, my wish list would consist of a couple of goalies, a good centre half to replace the ageing Dean Holden, and a striker with a little more experience than Bowerman. Tempting them down to the Banks's on the proviso that they'll be second choice won't be an easy task though.

Oh to have the luxury of a couple of Darren Wracks or Neil Emblens in the squad, who could come into the side and do a job pretty much anywhere.

true, and at higher levels than ours. arsenal in particular are an example of a good 1st team with poor squad cover.

i'm not criticizing anyone, just pointing out one of the reasons why we've fallen just short. this is the most optimistic i've felt for years - not that long ago we had no decent full backs, now we might be looking at 5!

regards praise for smith, the way he kept the belief and positivity in such a young squad during that awful run is hugely impressive.

User avatar
Magic Man Fan
Site Addict
 
Posts: 10977
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Warning. Some posts may cause offence...to the over sensitive or slow.

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:10 pm

WFC_Rob wrote:
wfc & chips wrote:the weakness of the squad against the strength of the 1st team is a huge factor. for example, our 1st choice centre-halves are great, their deputy awful. after our upturn, whenever any of our 1st choices were out (brandy, grigg, butler, taylor), we sorely missed them.

To an extent though, that's the nature of being a League One football club. Aside from the Bournemouths, Sheffield Utds and MK Dons of the league, the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis.

If the dream scenario comes together and we manage to keep our existing squad together, my wish list would consist of a couple of goalies, a good centre half to replace the ageing Dean Holden, and a striker with a little more experience than Bowerman. Tempting them down to the Banks's on the proviso that they'll be second choice won't be an easy task though.

Oh to have the luxury of a couple of Darren Wracks or Neil Emblens in the squad, who could come into the side and do a job pretty much anywhere.


Like Taundry you mean?

User avatar
WFC_Rob
Site Addict
 
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Birmingham/Shrewsbury

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:46 pm

Magic Man Fan wrote:
WFC_Rob wrote:
wfc & chips wrote:the weakness of the squad against the strength of the 1st team is a huge factor. for example, our 1st choice centre-halves are great, their deputy awful. after our upturn, whenever any of our 1st choices were out (brandy, grigg, butler, taylor), we sorely missed them.

To an extent though, that's the nature of being a League One football club. Aside from the Bournemouths, Sheffield Utds and MK Dons of the league, the rest have to keep their fingers crossed that they don't suffer a big injury crisis.

If the dream scenario comes together and we manage to keep our existing squad together, my wish list would consist of a couple of goalies, a good centre half to replace the ageing Dean Holden, and a striker with a little more experience than Bowerman. Tempting them down to the Banks's on the proviso that they'll be second choice won't be an easy task though.

Oh to have the luxury of a couple of Darren Wracks or Neil Emblens in the squad, who could come into the side and do a job pretty much anywhere.


Like Taundry you mean?

Sorry, should have said '...do a good job pretty much anywhere.'

Worsul
UTS Regular
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Bury ( H ) League One Sat 20/4/13

Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:19 pm

Promotion/Play off teams records against bottom teams. All better than Walsall. All nearly 2 pts per game or better.


P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Bournemouth 14 11 3 0 6 0 27 9 +18 36 2.57
2 Oldham Athletic 14 7 3 4 6 2 17 13 +4 24 1.71
3 Bury 14 5 3 6 2 5 16 21 -5 18 1.29
4 Colchester United 14 4 5 5 3 6 16 16 0 17 1.21
5 Hartlepool United 14 4 5 5 4 3 17 18 -1 17 1.21
6 Scunthorpe United 14 4 3 7 3 3 14 18 -4 15 1.07
7 Portsmouth 13 3 3 7 2 5 14 19 -5 12 0.92
8 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 7 5 4 6 10 17 -7 10 0.77


P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Doncaster Rovers 14 11 2 1 6 1 24 10 +14 35 2.50
2 Oldham Athletic 14 7 3 4 6 2 17 11 +6 24 1.71
3 Bury 14 6 2 6 3 5 16 17 -1 20 1.43
4 Colchester United 14 4 5 5 3 5 17 17 0 17 1.21
5 Hartlepool United 14 4 5 5 4 4 16 19 -3 17 1.21
6 Scunthorpe United 14 4 3 7 3 3 15 22 -7 15 1.07
7 Portsmouth 13 3 3 7 2 5 14 18 -4 12 0.92
8 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 7 5 4 6 10 15 -5 10 0.77



P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Brentford 14 7 7 0 8 3 18 9 +9 28 2.00
2 Oldham Athletic 14 7 3 4 6 3 16 11 +5 24 1.71
3 Bury 14 5 4 5 3 6 15 17 -2 19 1.36
4 Hartlepool United 14 4 6 4 4 3 18 18 0 18 1.29
5 Colchester United 14 4 5 5 3 5 17 18 -1 17 1.21
6 Scunthorpe United 14 4 4 6 3 3 14 17 -3 16 1.14
7 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 9 3 6 7 9 12 -3 12 0.92
8 Portsmouth 13 3 2 8 2 5 15 20 -5 11 0.85



P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Yeovil Town 13 9 1 3 4 3 25 11 +14 28 2.15
2 Oldham Athletic 14 8 3 3 7 1 18 12 +6 27 1.93
3 Colchester United 14 5 5 4 4 4 19 17 +2 20 1.43
4 Bury 13 5 2 6 2 5 14 17 -3 17 1.31
5 Hartlepool United 14 4 5 5 5 5 15 16 -1 17 1.21
6 Portsmouth 13 4 2 7 2 4 16 19 -3 14 1.08
7 Scunthorpe United 14 4 3 7 3 4 13 22 -9 15 1.07
8 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 7 5 4 5 11 17 -6 10 0.77


P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Swindon Town 13 7 4 2 7 3 17 6 +11 25 1.92
2 Oldham Athletic 14 7 4 3 6 2 17 11 +6 25 1.79
3 Colchester United 14 5 5 4 4 5 17 15 +2 20 1.43
4 Bury 14 6 2 6 3 6 14 16 -2 20 1.43
5 Hartlepool United 14 4 6 4 5 4 16 16 0 18 1.29
6 Scunthorpe United 13 4 4 5 3 2 14 16 -2 16 1.23
7 Portsmouth 13 3 2 8 2 5 14 23 -9 11 0.85
8 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 7 5 4 7 9 15 -6 10 0.77



P W D L CS FtS F A GD Pt PPG
1 Sheffield United 14 8 4 2 6 1 22 12 +10 28 2.00
2 Oldham Athletic 14 7 4 3 6 2 17 11 +6 25 1.79
3 Hartlepool United 14 5 4 5 4 3 19 19 0 19 1.36
4 Colchester United 14 4 6 4 3 5 17 18 -1 18 1.29
5 Bury 14 5 3 6 2 6 14 18 -4 18 1.29
6 Scunthorpe United 14 4 4 6 3 3 14 19 -5 16 1.14
7 Portsmouth 13 4 2 7 3 5 16 17 -1 14 1.08
8 Shrewsbury Town 13 1 7 5 4 6 10 15 -5 10 0.77

Previous
Return to 2012-13 Season

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest