King Crimson wrote:Whitters wrote:kshammer wrote:Lilsnappa wrote:Am i reading correctly that a match reaction thread about one of the greatest local derby victories we have had for some time has turned into another blooming boring argument about the blooming freehold and Bonser?!
He is the best we have for now, he isnt going anywhere for a while and we are unlikely to be brought out by some rich oil baron. We have a cracking young squad and are playing beautiful football. stop arguing amongst yourself and actually look at the state of our club at the minute.
These are good times to be a Saddler, take note.
Superb post.
I know the usual bores want to spoil everything but couldn't believe it was brought up on this thread. Pathetic.
I blame it on the mods - they should police it better and step in when threads get off subject.
Scones anyone?
Should we? Deviation from a thread's original theme can be both entertaining and at times more engaging than the original topic. It is also a more accurate reflection of human interaction: to digress, or progress, discussion.
I would also be concerned where one draws a line between development of a theme and deviation from it. Discussion on the ownership of the club may inevitably occur if, say, following a fine performance there is concern whether we can secure out of contract players.
Technically, your post on board moderation takes this thread more off topic than posts on the club's ownership. But you have used an opportune moment to raise a matter, to which I have responded. To stop such opportunity would make this board much less compelling a read in my view.
I agree with you KC.
I was 'avin a laugh.
I'll put a smiley icon in next time.
However if I want to read the posts on the club's ownership in a week or two I'll have to remember to look under Shrewsbury Town (H) League 1 Saturday 2/3/13.
Plus if I want to read resident-village-idiot Saigon's startling contribution again - a compelling read indeed - I'll also have to remember this thread.
"Such is life" (Jagger, M.)