Welsh_Saddler wrote:Attendance 3,712
According to the BBC website Beevers is making save after save :D
He's done really well. We've been the better team this half.
Welsh_Saddler wrote:Attendance 3,712
According to the BBC website Beevers is making save after save :D
Sadsfan wrote:Probably our best home performance of the season, Wilson has looked very good.
Ancient Moaner wrote:Sadsfan wrote:Probably our best home performance of the season, Wilson has looked very good.
No matter how good the 'performance' , we are still losin every match now, Deano will have to watch over his shoulder, even our puppet Board will not suffer this humiliation for much longer.!
Ancient Moaner wrote:'Interesting' clash next week Grof versus Rhodes.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Aldridge_saddler wrote:Our besst performance in a while and all you can do is moan... My god you make me sick!! Christ jimmy walker and the lino, made 2 bad decisions. How is that Smith's fault? Jesus!
Saarland Saddler wrote:Aldridge_saddler wrote:Our besst performance in a while and all you can do is moan... My god you make me sick!! Christ jimmy walker and the lino, made 2 bad decisions. How is that Smith's fault? Jesus!
I love you fella.
But we are not nearly bottom because of one game. I will always give Deano time but if things don't improve soon then he has to go unfortunately - and I say that with a heavy heart.
Aldridge_saddler wrote:Christ jimmy walker...
priestley_saddler wrote:It's very rare that you play a match for an hour with 10 men and an outfield player in goal. However, its even rarer to come out of said match feeling unlucky to have lost it.
It was an even enough game up to the red card, and then madness ensued. Personally I have no complaints with the red card. I know handball outside the box isn't a mandatory red card, but it was the pre-meditated manner in which he did it that sealed his fate. If a keeper comes to the edge of his box, claims the ball, and his momentum carries him outside the area then that's unfortunate...but that's not what happened. He came to the edge of his area, stopped to wait for the ball, realised it might not reach him, thought about it for a second, steppped foot outside his box, picked the ball up, then turned round and stepped back. Absolute and total stupidity from a man who should have known better.
You could argue the referee might have given him the benefit of the doubt and just booked him, but it wouldn't have mattered anyway as had he stayed on the pitch he would surely have been sent off for dissent after the second goal, which even Stevie Wonder would have flagged for offside. It wasn't even close, not half a yard, or a yard, or even a yard and half. He was offside by roughly the length of your average lounge, which somehow the linesman managed to miss. I don't blame the ref, he can't give offside if the linesman hasn't flagged, but the linesman should be ashamed of himself and be given a lengthy sabbatical from linesmaning.
The red card for Wacka did raise the obvious question "Why no keeper on the bench?" and will surely get people who weren't there calling for Deano's head and calling him an idiot for not doing so. However, if Beevers goalkeeping ability was already known to Smith then it makes a great deal of sense not to have a keeper, as he proved more than capable in what is a difficult and specialised position. The laughable decision to give MOTM to Manny Smith was grossly unfair on Beevers, who made regulation stop after regulation stop. Although they're not really regulation if you're a fullback.
I've never understood the term "This could be a cricket score" when describing a football match, I've never heard of a football match finishing 117/4. However, a rugby score did look likely at half time. Yet, somewhat madly, we were the better team in the second half and really shouldn't have lost. I'd go as far as to say its the best 45 minutes we've played since Sheffield United, but it does leave the question why couldn't we play like that first half when we had 11 men?? Nicholls had a chance which their defender deflected out for a corner...only for the hapless lineman to give a goalkick. Paterson forced a full length stop from their keeper which he finger tipped wide, and Gnakpa had an effort which rebounded off both posts before bouncing away.
Its accurate to say we're not getting the rub of the green lately and we're definitely owed a few decisions, and I hope the morons amongst us stick with Deano and don't start/continue calling for him to go. However, a team that has five players sent off before the clocks go back has one or two disciplinary issues as it is costing us dearly.
Walker - Absolute numpty. Cost us the game. Nuff said.
Beevers - MOTM. Took the keepers jersey in what looked a pre-agreed move should anything happen to Wacka. Played really well and earned his money today, however I find it unlikely he'll keep his place in goal at Huddersfield.
Sadler - Got done once in the first half, but got away with it when their player fell over. Other than that a usual steady and reliable game.
Smith - Got sponsors MOTM and didn't have a bad game, but not MOTM. Booked for dissent after the second goal.
Butler - Steady but unspectacular. Made a couple of crunching tackles and probably slightly out performed Smith.
Hurst - Reverted back to the left and put a couple of decent crosses in, but was brought off injured just before the break. Much better on the right.
Taundry - The peculiar inclusion in the line up. Should never have started, and absolute never should he start wide right. Not sure what the thinking was behind it. Was adequate at right back.
Peterlin - I said on Tuesday he's possibly the best midfielder at the club, and continued it again today. Played well.
Wilson - An adequate debut by the new man, hopefully there's more to come from him.
Macken - Didn't do a lot prior to being withdrew tactically after the Wacka red.
Nicholls - Battled away and did well considering he was living off scraps. Definitely in a purple patch form wise.
Subs
Paterson - Should have started, and proved it by being probably our best player in the second half.
Gnakpa - A much improved performance and certainly wont come closer to scoring without actually doing so.
priestley_saddler wrote:It's very rare that you play a match....
brackley wrote:following Wacka's sending off, which for the record I thought was an absolute joke! Assuming the lino was right, it would have been that marginal and was never a clear goalscoring opportunity as their man had our defenders around him.......
tinned wrote:brackley wrote:following Wacka's sending off, which for the record I thought was an absolute joke! Assuming the lino was right, it would have been that marginal and was never a clear goalscoring opportunity as their man had our defenders around him.......
You're joking right??? It was so blatant handball out of the area it was untrue. I'm known for wearing rose-tinted spectacles but come on .....
Whacker, yowm a prat!
SheffieldSaddler wrote:MK havent won in 4 league away matches
Walsall do have an half decent record against them.
But we are absolutely useless and would fail to beat most Sunday League pub teams at the moment
Walsall 0 MK 2
tinned wrote:brackley wrote:following Wacka's sending off, which for the record I thought was an absolute joke! Assuming the lino was right, it would have been that marginal and was never a clear goalscoring opportunity as their man had our defenders around him.......
You're joking right??? It was so blatant handball out of the area it was untrue. I'm known for wearing rose-tinted spectacles but come on .....
Whacker, yowm a prat!
Pedagogue wrote:Can I just make a point of football law?
A goalkeeper handling the ball outside his penalty-area is NOT, I repeat NOT, contrary to popular belief, an automatic sending-off offence. It is punishable by a direct free-kick. However, IF the referee considers that the goalkeeper has denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, then, and only then, he must send off the goalkeeper.
Pedagogue wrote:Can I just make a point of football law?
A goalkeeper handling the ball outside his penalty-area is NOT, I repeat NOT, contrary to popular belief, an automatic sending-off offence. It is punishable by a direct free-kick. However, IF the referee considers that the goalkeeper has denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, then, and only then, he must send off the goalkeeper.
brackley wrote:Pedagogue wrote:Can I just make a point of football law?
A goalkeeper handling the ball outside his penalty-area is NOT, I repeat NOT, contrary to popular belief, an automatic sending-off offence. It is punishable by a direct free-kick. However, IF the referee considers that the goalkeeper has denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, then, and only then, he must send off the goalkeeper.
Absolutely correct my friend........... and in my view it was not a clear goalscoring opportunity. In over 500 games at semi-pro level and having done exactly the same as Wacka, I never got sent off - always a yellow!!
|n fairness from where i was sitting I didnt have a clear view of how marinally outside the box he was or wasnt - theres no denying a bad error....... goalkeeping is about decision making and often only with a split second to decide - he got it wrong when he should have used his head to clear it from danger and clattered their fella in the process!
belgiansaddler wrote:Sounds like a spirited second half performan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests